> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:44 PM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a way to influence the order in which (sub)ports are upgraded?
upgrade works in dependency order > I'm testing the upgrade of my qt5-mac-devel port from Qt 5.4.0 to 5.4.1, with > almost all its subports installed. I've run into an error that can only be > explained by an inappropriate upgrading order: qt5-mac-devel-docs complains > about mixing library versions. It took me a while to understand, but this > error must stem from the fact that qt5-mac-devel-docs is upgraded before some > of the other subports. > > What possibilities do I have to postpone the docs subport to after all other > installed subports have been upgraded? Is there an accepted/advised naming > scheme one can use is the order is strictly determined by port names? (In > this case, I cannot simply let the docs subport depend on all other subports, > IMHO.) why not? it sounds like there is a dependency there (on at least one of the library ports) > Reporting this upstream will only lead to another confirmation that one > shouldn't build software with a previous version installed... note that trace mode fixes this ;-) -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
