On Wednesday March 04 2015 16:57:19 Mihai Moldovan wrote: > > You have a lot of faith in this mode, and the extent to which it is > > possible to let it handle each and every case appropriately for each and > > every (potential) port out there. > > Yes, we do. Because trace mode is doing the right thing™. Yes, the name
And you said something about being too dogmatic? O:-) > P.S.: could you please fix your client to not always add "Undisclosed > Recipients: ;"? I have to remove that every single time I answer to any > of your posts. I have no idea, I don't see anything in my kmail configuration that suggests it's adding that header or entry, nor do I see it in the headers of my sent messages. R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
