On Thursday March 05 2015 14:58:44 meik michalke wrote:

Hi

>yes, there is an official portfile in MacPorts:
> https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/kde/rkward/Portfile

Doh, I should have checked that myself ...

>MacPorts doesn't want official portfiles to use libraries outside the MacPorts 

I'm guessing you might be able to load the R library at runtime (dlopen), in 
which case its location becomes a configurable property and MacPorts can no 
longer impose any rules on it ;)

>ok, then we can probably just ignore it.

Yes. Caveats may apply, but it appears to be without consequence.

>if we could we'd simply build the bundle on 10.9 or 10.10 and check if that 
>does the trick. there are some differences between 10.7 and 10.9 which could 
>have an impact here (no XQuartz, different R binary package, latest XCode 
>version...), but we're currently stuck with 10.7. i'm tempted to install 
>GNU/linux on the iMac and run OS X in a virtual machine on that hardware, to 
>be more flexible on that side.

Note that you can run 10.9 in a VM on 10.6 and higher (using Parallels Desktop 
9 or earlier). I've done that to get used to 10.9 and set things up to my taste 
for months before I finally switched to 10.9 .
It's also possible to run 10.9 (and presumably 10.10) in VirtualBox, but then 
you'd probably want to use a headless VM and VNC to connect to it.

What do you mean "no XQuartz"? I'm running XQuartz on 10.9 just fine, and it's 
also supposed to work on 10.10 .
And I doubt that you're looking to use X11 displaying in R if your GUI is 
Qt-based.

Unless ... you're not using port:qt4-x11, are you?!

R
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to