On 25 Apr 2015, at 17:49, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2015, at 5:49 AM, petr <9...@ingv.it> wrote:
>
>> To my understanding the +clang3{0,1,2} refer to clang-3.{0,1,2} respectively.
>
> Yup.
>
>> These clang ports are no obsolete.
>
> Yup.
>
>> However, there are still quite some ports around with these variants, so I
>> guess these clang3{0,1,2} variants (and maybe others) should be removed?
>
> Yup.
>
> vq
Okay,
anything else which should be considered for a "variant cleanup"?
I guess the same applies to dragonegg3? < dragonegg33. I would also propose to
remove all +gcc4? < gcc47 and all related openmpi and mpich variants. I am
CCing Sean and Eric explicitly for their involvement in compiler Portgroup,
openmpi or mpich, respectively.
Does it make sense to turn this into a macro ticket?
Not sure if people are fond of getting all these ticket change notifications
(cf. perl version ticket).
~petr
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
