On Jun 20, 2015, at 11:40 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Revision
> 137816
> Author
> [email protected]
> Date
> 2015-06-20 09:40:01 -0700 (Sat, 20 Jun 2015)
> Log Message
>
> libpagemaker: new maintainer submission (#48062).
> --- trunk/dports/graphics/libpagemaker/Portfile
> (rev 0)
> +++ trunk/dports/graphics/libpagemaker/Portfile 2015-06-20 16:40:01 UTC
> (rev 137816)
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil;
> c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:ft=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
> +# $Id$
> +
> +PortSystem 1.0
> +
> +name libpagemaker
> +version 0.0.2
> +categories graphics
> +license {GPL-2.1+ LGPL-2.1+ MPL-1.1+}
> +maintainers zip.com.au:cbradney openmaintainer
> +platforms darwin
> +homepage http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/libpagemaker
This URL is 404 not found.
> +# build fix for gcc-4.2 (#43487)
> +if {[string match "*gcc*" ${configure.compiler}]} {
> + configure.cxxflags-append -Wno-long-long
> +}
Ticket #43487 is about a different port. Was this block copied here because it
was verified that the same problem exists in this port?
> +# The packaged glibtool in 0.1.1 doesn't pass --stdlib=libc++ down at link
> time
> +use_autoreconf yes
> +autoreconf.args -fvi
The port's version is 0.0.2, not 0.1.1, so I assume this was copied from
another port as well. Was this block copied here because it was verified that
the same problem exists in this port?
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
