Hi Ryan,

> If fixing those two ports is more complicated than just updating them to a
> newer version, or copying an existing patch from upstream, then yes, it
> would be fine to create an opencv2 port.

ok, I'll wait a bit until I have feedback from the digikam developer, but
I have no idea about VLC-devel and the other hidden cases of conflicts.


> However, while it should be based on the last commit of the opencv port
> before it was updated to version 3, it would need to be modified to
> install its files to different locations, so that it does not conflict
> with the opencv port.

That would be the ideal case. I would have made the two opencv versions
simply conflicting for now.

Greets,
Marko
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to