On 05.07.2015 09:01 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > octave doesn't contain any static libraries, so we're talking about a dynamic > library... wouldn't octave-control then simply use the newer octave dynamic > library when octave is updated?
Please make that up with Marius. I do not use octave, but would rather revbump a port once too often than break it by not revbumping it. I have no idea what octave-control itself is hardcoding or linking, thus used the benefit of a doubt to do what was suggested. Mihai
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
