Yes, and I seem to remember having this conversation once before... :) On 2015-10-12 05:06 , Daniel J. Luke wrote: > it’s really useful for the case when upstream publishes a checksum (that’s > not one of our default ‘good’ ones) when the output includes the checksums > that are in the portfile. > >> On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:34 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Use $default_checksum_types for handy copy/paste output on checksum failure >> >> This should help adoption of better, more robust hashing algorithms. > > — > Daniel J. Luke > > +========================================================+ > | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | > > | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | > > +========================================================+ > | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | > > | reflect the opinions of my employer. | > > +========================================================+ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > macports-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev >
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
