On 25 January 2016 at 18:55, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2016, at 09:29, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> (Even more than that I would really like to see the buildbots with >> libc++ as their default stdlib being set up.) > > As far as I know nothing has changed on this front. I'm totally willing to > set up libc++ build slaves for 10.6, 10.7 and 10.8, but cannot do so until we > agree on a naming scheme to differentiate libc++ packages from libstdc++ > packages, implement that in base, and release it. > > Well, that would be a prerequisite for *distributing* such packages. I > suppose we could set up build slaves that just build and don't distribute > their packages. But that wouldn't be as helpful.
I opened a new ticket: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/50448 Mojca _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev