On Friday January 29 2016 09:23:15 Eric A. Borisch wrote: >Perhaps an opportunistic execution of afsctool on just-extracted (not >yet moved into place) files in portimage.tcl (similar to the >opportunistic use of lbzip2 or pbzip2 during extraction) could be >done?
Sure, that's a possibility. >I'd tend towards find + xargs (possibly with -P <jobs> to speed I'm not sure why you'd want that? Even the "stock" afsctool can take a directory. >controlled (able to be forcefully disabled) by a config option and a >check that the filesystem is HFS+. Afsctool won't attempt anything if the fs isn't HFS+ or the file isn't of a supported type. R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
