On Aug 10, 2016, at 13:18, Peter Danecek <peter.dane...@ingv.it> wrote: > > However, how would we procede in this case, when we have no explicit > replacement to indicate?
I believe the obsolete 1.0 portgroup can accommodate this: include the portgroup but don't set replaced_by. However, do first consider whether this needs to be done, or whether the port can instead be left as is. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
