On 2016-09-16 17:33, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I would keep this as Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, the name does not change
>> retroactively.
>
> I suppose that's an open question. Previously, I've tried to use the OS
> marketing name as it was when that OS version was released. Now, I'm thinking
> we should always use the current marketing name. Do we have any guidance from
> Apple on what they want people to do?
>
>> The version number is usually also helpful to get the
>> "10.X" to "darwin Y" mapping right.
>
> Yes but I didn't want to go into a long explanation in that comment.
Then let's just replace it here with "(e.g. 16 for macOS 10.12 Sierra)"
to avoid the confusion.
>>> options minimum_xcodeversions
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
>>> return -code error "unable to find Xcode"
>>> }
>>> if {[vercmp ${xcodeversion} ${minimum_xcodeversion}] < 0} {
>>> - ui_error "On Mac OS X ${macosx_version}, ${name}
>>> ${version} requires Xcode ${minimum_xcodeversion} or later but you have
>>> Xcode ${xcodeversion}."
>>> + ui_error "On macOS ${macosx_version}, ${name}
>>> @${version} requires Xcode ${minimum_xcodeversion} or later but you have
>>> Xcode ${xcodeversion}."
>>
>> Why drop the foo @1.0 syntax that we use at so many other places to
>> specify a port version?
>
> I didn't drop it; I started using it, finally, in this portgroup.
Sorry, somehow I misread that in reverse... I blame Friday :-)
Rainer
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
