Hi, On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:23:17AM -0700, Dan Ports wrote: > For me, the main benefit is that it's immediately obvious where the > patch comes from, and, since it's github, how it relates to the > release version. (In this case, it's a backported patch from an > unreleased version.)
This is something we should track anyway, regardless of where a patch is or whether it is copied. I've made it a habit to follow http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines#Patch_Header_Recommendations in patchfiles for my port, i.e. include Upstream-Status: Backport [$commit-id] or Upstream-Status: Submitted [$url-to-pull-request-or-mailing-list] or Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [configuration] I encourage others to do the same. > Obviously, there are other ways to accomplish this, but this one seems > as good as any... -- Clemens _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
