On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
<jerem...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 9, 2016, at 09:47, Jack Howarth <howarth.at.macpo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
>> <jerem...@apple.com> wrote:
>>> thread_local support was added in OS X 10.9 (along with __cxa_thread_atexit 
>>> being added to Libc as part of that support).  As long as your minimum 
>>> deployment target is 10.9, you should be fine.  The issue is that you're on 
>>> 10.6, so you don't have __cxa_thread_atexit.
>>>
>>> There is active conversation right now about adding a fallback 
>>> implementation of __cxa_thread_atexit directly into libcxxabi.  See 
>>> https://reviews.llvm.org/D21803 as that might be quite useful for your 
>>> needs.  If so, provide a patch to libcxxabi that incorporates it, and I'll 
>>> get it in.
>>
>> On the topic of thread local support, the failures in the guile 2.0.x
>> test suite should be looked at...
>>
>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52556
>>
>> to determine if Apple's thread-local-storage implementation is buggy
>> as upstream guile claims.
>
> Radar?

radar://28688091 "guile 2.0.12 exposes potential thread-local-storage
bug on Mac OS X"

Note that currently the guile Portfile in MacPorts lacks the support
for 'sudo port -d test guile' to work.

>
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to