On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:57:51PM +0200, Marko Käning wrote: > The only question mark I have there is: > > Will we ask the committers to squash their changesets or prefer to > clutter the main repo with potentially many tiny iterations for the > changed ports??
I think "clutter" is not the appropriate word here. We will also not ask committers to generally squash all their changes. > Personally I don’t like history rewriting, but a squash every now and > then seems fine to me, as an update to a port sometimes requires a few > iterations until it is ready for pushing to the central repo and it is > usually one logical unit deserving an atomic commit. It will probably be up to you as a MacPorts developer. I agree that logical units should be committed atomically, but that doesn't mean that you cannot commit multiple atomic changes in one push or pull request. -- Clemens _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
