On 3 Apr 2017, at 17:52, Ken Cunningham <ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> wrote: > so this sorta gets back to your question about support for older systems, and > is a pretty typical example of same. > sounds like you could write up an openssl variant for it, default to that > variant on suitable systems, and nobody would likely complain about that. But > you might have to do it and submit the PR.
Yes, I certainly would, had I older systems set up. But I have not — so this was just a hint, in case someone opens a ticket for mosh not compiling with commoncrypto on older systems, for them to try. Now, is commoncrypto that modern or better than openssl (which is mosh's default lib)? Well, I cannot judge with expertise and deem this as peremptory.
