Russell Jones <russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk> writes: > On 10/05/17 02:26, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> On May 8, 2017, at 12:36 PM, m...@macports.org wrote: >>> I think we should strive to support the latest versions of python 2 and 3 >>> only. >> +1 (just like we should do with perl5). >> > -1. We should give module and port maintainers a chance to support 3.x > with x maximal, and either > > a) wait for some reasonable seeming measure of time, e.g., until 3.x.1 > or 3.x.2 are out, or > > b) keep 3.(x-1) until some proportion (90%?) of modules for it are > supported for 3.x, or removed from MacPorts if upstream have no plans to > support 3.x (this perhaps sounds drastic, but has the same effect as > only supporting 3.x, and for a smaller set of ports)
I don't think it's that big a deal since the major breakage is between python 2 and 3. As in, I'd be surprised if a port that works for 3.4 does not work for 3.5. (shrug)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
