On 2018-4-12 00:37 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: > We could move them to something like "changesneeded" (not sure where > exactly; they could get a special status, even if closed, but it > should be easy enough to find them should anyone have motivation to > fix the remaining issues). Just because none of us took the time to > review the changes for long enough that all dependency and the > software itself became completely outdated in the meantime, doesn't > mean that we should make the submissions non-discoverable and give the > signal to users that first of all we don't care for 5 years, and when > we start caring, we boldly close all the tickets. > > Very often I see tickets getting status "upstream", "infoneeded" etc. > which basically means that developers would ignore such tickets until > something happens. Or perhaps "helpneeded" which means that they are > genuinely interested in fixing the issue, but have no resources to fix > it. We need something similar.
New ticket resolutions are something we can do. - Josh