clang does not work on PowerPC.
> On Jul 29, 2018, at 13:20, Christopher Jones <jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > Great thanks. > > I’m hopeful that libgcc is going to be OK, but if not please post a full log > to the PR. > > It would be nice if libgcc-devel also built, but this is not so important at > this point. I had to blacklist gcc-4.2 to get it to build on intel 10.6 (so > fallback to MPs clang-3.4) but I am not sure what this blacklist will do on > Darwin 9 PPC. It might try and fallback to a gcc build which will then cause > problems with a dependency loop. I am hoping instead it also defaults to > clang-3.4 (or we can convince it to). Its also true that gcc9/libgcc-devel is > only a snapshot, so things might improve in before a final release (which is > why right now I don’t think its a big deal). > > Chris > >> On 29 Jul 2018, at 7:12 pm, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Jul 29, 2018, at 11:32, Chris Jones wrote: >> >>> Is there anyone who has a PPC machine running Darwin 9 (OSX 10.5) that >>> would be willing to run a test of the PR >>> >>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/2296 >>> >>> ? For the reasons outlined in the PR it would be useful to know if the port >>> libgcc builds properly on this platform. I have tested the rest, 10.6 >>> upwards, but Darwin 9 is one I don’t have access to. >> >> I'll give it a try! >> >
