> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > > proposed new naming scheme for llvm & clang 10+ as prev discussed. > > explanation why in PR. Up to group, but will affect everything if it > > goes through. I'm fine either way, leave naming pattern as is or change > > it. Once in, no going back... > > > > see <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60169> > > I thought that the naming scheme change involved how the version suffixing > is handled, but I don't see how that relates to the ticket referenced > here. > > Fred Wright
Fred, you are so right. I meant to paste in the URL to the PR, but i guess somehow had that ticket URL loaded instead and pasted a URL to something else. Apologies. Please see: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/6902 Ken