> On Apr 3, 2021, at 8:21 PM, wowfunha...@gmail.com <wowfunha...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>>> On 2021-1-27 02:57 , Andrew Janke wrote:
>>> I didn't know that! I must be behind the times with the state of  MacPorts. 
>>> Thanks for the update.
>> About a decade behind -- the buildbot went live in 2011. ;)
>> - Josh
> 
> I see this misconception all over the place, that Homebrew is fast because it 
> uses prebuilt binaries, whereas MacPorts makes you wait while software is 
> compiled. It can't just be due to outdated information, if we're more than a 
> decade out from when the buildbot went live.
> 
> I know it's just one data point, but I thought the replies I got on this 
> Hacker News comment today were interesting. I can understand why he/she got 
> confused, and I wonder if there's anything MacPorts could do to make it 
> clearer. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26678498 
> <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26678498>
It happens that I just did a self update and upgraded 20 ports on 10.15.  6 or 
the 20 were built from source.  I believe this is higher than usual due to the 
backlog on the 10.15 builbot.  Even in the best case, however, a fair number of 
ports will be built from source for the well-known reasons.  It would be 
interesting to know, say, how many of our most-requested ports are always built 
from source.

https://ports.macports.org/statistics/ports/?days=30&first=-req_count&second=-total_count&third=port

Eg, git is our second-most requested port and it is always built from source 
AFAIK.

Almost any reasonably complex package will have some of its dependencies that 
must be built from source.  

To the average user, I would suggest that we should emphasize that MacPorts 
installs binaries whenever allowed by licensing but makes a serious effort to 
avoid contravening the various open source licenses.  Plus MacPorts offers many 
more options (“variants”) to customize installations and offers a wide breadth 
of packages.

Craig

Reply via email to