On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:42 PM Eric Gallager <eg...@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 11:30 AM Christopher Chavez <chrischa...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > > Should CI/buildbots report any errors from `port rev-upgrade`? (I'm not > > aware that they already do.) > > > > Additionally, is it true that, once CI or a buildbot has built and > > installed a port, `port rev-upgrade` should never report any errors? If so, > > should the build be marked as failed if there are rev-upgrade errors? > > > > Would others find this behavior helpful? > > > > > > Christopher A. Chavez (who recently neglected to check the result of > > rev-upgrade before submitting a port update) > > I agree that this behavior would be helpful, however, doing so would > require keeping the results of previous builds installed, whereas I > think the current behavior is to do all builds from a fresh > environment...
Here's an idea: instead of having the buildbot report things from rev-upgrade, how about allowing users to automatically upload their own rev-upgrade lists as part of their mpstats submissions, if they have the mpstats port installed? That way the server wouldn't have to keep a bunch of old ports from previous builds installed, and people would be able to see what rev-upgrade errors actual users are actually experiencing...
