On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:55:10PM -0800, Mark Duling wrote:
> Garrett Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tuesday, February 27, 2007 at
> 11:10 AM -0800 wrote:
> >I have a fairly fresh macports install, but a few parts seem broken.
> >Any help would be much appreciated.
> >
> >tcptraceroute doesn't work.
> >On a tcptraceroute google.com, I get:
> >libnet_write failed?  Attempted to write 40 bytes, only wrote -1
> 
> I saw this too.  There was a patch to libnet11's configure.in committed
> some time ago that was supposed to fix this.
> 
> But it looks like autoconf is not run so it doesn't take effect.  I
> inserted:
> 
> use_autoconf    yes
> 
> into the libnet11 portfile and uninstalled, cleaned, reinstalled and now
> tcptraceroute works on my MacBook.  If someone can confirm this the fix
> could be committed.  I know Toby won't mind someone else committing the
> change, because I've emailed him in the past for this port.  But I'm
> leaving town tonight and I don't want to make any changes now for safety's
> sake.  But try it and someone else could commit it.


        Testing...
        libnet11 with 'use_autoconf', tcptraceroute works fine.
        Hmm, lets see if it works w/o 'use_autoconf'...
        works fine w/o 'use_autoconf' as  well.
        Ah, I'm on ppc.  Lets try x86...

        Without 'use_autoconf' in libnet11...    tcptraceroute fails.
        Trying with 'use_autoconf in libnet11... tcptraceroute works.

        I'll go ahead and commit the fix in a minute.


[snip]
> 
> Perhaps we need to make libnet11 and libnet compatible like the FreeBSD
> and OpenBSD projects have done.
> 
> Mark
> 

        I agree, having both libnet11 and libnet co-exist would be great.


                -eric


_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to