On Feb 17, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Esteban Barahona wrote: > That may be the main objective, but why not also support darwin > without the propietary parts of Mac OS X? As I understand it, if it > runs on Darwin it must run on Mac OS X... but I guess it's CLI-only > apps...
Because it's more work (just being at the CLI doesn't mean MacOSX technologies can't easily become dependencies) for pretty much no gain. Darwin as a stand-alone OS is dead and has been dead for enough years now that there's just no point in supporting it. - Jordan _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users