It's definitely not the first. I assume they added code to support aqua and it's API's. I'm not a developer. just google for answers :)
Harry 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee <tim...@rochester.rr.com> > Hmm.. thats interesting.So, does that imply that aqua provides a X11-like > API (w/ libs) or does that mean that the actual people writing packages > (like openoffice) need to support aqua calls conditionally compiled in on > detection of the aqua include/libs? > > thanks > > On Jan 24, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > It is something completely different. Most linux, netbsd and freebsd > packages rely on X11. MacOSX has support for x11 but the native windowing > system of MacOSX is aqua. Using the -x11 option means that you don't build > for X11. An increasing amount of binaries and libraries support native aqua > and in that case I don't want to build for X11. It's slower, bigger (X11 > takes also memory and resources next to the already available aqua) and > ugglier. But the last is off course a matter of taste. > Note that some binaries and libraries are still considered beta under aqua > (like Gimp) but function very good. > If you take a look at openoffice (not macports) you see what I mean. It has > already been available for MacOSX in X11 form for a long period. > Recently they also released a 3.0 beta version for Aqua which works fine. > NeoOffice is an aqua spin-off of OpenOffice and has a native Aqua interface > for about 1½ years now. In versioning it runs a bit behind OpenOffice (OOO > 3.0.x versus NOO 2.2.5) > > Note also that some packages that are compiled with -x11, simply miss the > X11 gui but only compile/create the command line versions. > > Harry > > > > 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee <tim...@rochester.rr.com> > >> Harry-You made reference to adding the -x11 tag to your variants.conf. >> By doing this, do you force macports to use Apple's X11? Or is it >> something else entirely different? >> >> thanks >> >> >> On Jan 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: >> >> 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee <tim...@rochester.rr.com> >> Thanks for the reply Harry- I'm fairly sure that I will need to lipo >> together the builds for Musicbrainz' Picard. >> So - in your experience what are all the options that I must set after a >> fresh src install to have a 10.5 setup building binaries for 10.4? >> >> >> Nothing more than setting the right options in your macports.conf and then >> see how far you get. >> >> >> >> 2009/1/24 Timothy Lee <tim...@rochester.rr.com> >> >>> >>> On Jan 24, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 23, 2009, at 09:11, <tim...@rochester.rr.com> < >>>> tim...@rochester.rr.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Timothy Lee wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you know if its possible for me (on leopard) to build x86 code >>>>>>> (all >>>>>>> my macports ports) that will also run on Tiger? >>>>>>> Short of physical access to an intel 10.4 install, is there anything >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> can do? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't forget to use Reply All so the discussion goes to the list as >>>>>> well. There are no guarantees that this will work, but the way to do >>>>>> what you want would be to set universal_target to 10.4, >>>>>> universal_sysroot to /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk, and >>>>>> universal_archs to i386. Then build everything with +universal (best >>>>>> to >>>>>> add it to your variants.conf). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> Also set x11prefix to /usr/X11R6; Leopard's X11 prefix /usr/X11 does not >>>> exist on Tiger. >>>> >>>> >>> If I do this, how will I be able to run the executables on my 10.5 setup? >>> >>> >> >> I ran into the same issue and simply decided to make links. >> >> On Tiger I simply did "sudo ln -s /usr/X11R6 /usr/X11". If you build on >> Tiger and bring them to Leopard you do >> "sudo ln -s /usr/X11 /usr/X11R6". >> >> This works only on your own system off course, unless you make an >> installer that checks whether it runs on Tiger or Leopard and creates a >> softlink accordingly. >> >> Harry >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> macports-users mailing list >> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > macports-users mailing list > macports-users@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users > > >
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users