If I hand edit the /opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/port1.0/portmain.tcl file, will it be 'merged' automatically the next time macports version is bumped or is it a simple 'rm' and then 'cp' the new file in?
thanks ---- Harry van der Wolf <hvdw...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/1/25 Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> > > > Timothy Lee wrote: > > > Ryan- > > > Thanks for the tip on not adding the '/' to the --prefix - that fixed > > > the problem. > > > > > > In regards to the +universal variants - my universal_target only > > > contains "i386" as suggested by Josh. My other settings look like this: > > > > > > *# Options for Universal Binaries (+universal variant)* > > > * > > > * > > > *# MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET* > > > *universal_target 10.4* > > > * > > > * > > > *# the SDK "sysroot" to use * > > > *universal_sysroot /Xcode3_0/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk* > > > * > > > * > > > *# machine architectures* > > > *universal_archs i386* > > > > > > Again- my variants.conf only contains +universal and my macports.conf as > > > the variants_conf path set correctly - yet I still see the deployment is > > > being set to 10.5. > > > > Argh, sorry, I forgot - this is broken in the released version. I fixed > > it here: <http://trac.macports.org/changeset/44363> > > > > You can apply that change to > > /opt/local/share/macports/Tcl/port1.0/portmain.tcl, or install MP from > > svn trunk if you're so inclined. > > > > That might also be the reason why it worked for me "by accident". I > installed the "pre 1.7 svn trunk" somewhere in October/November and worked > with it until 5th or 6th of January. I skipped the official 1.7 version and > installed a new version of the svn trunk (somewhere on 4-6 January), > obviously including the patch (didn't even know there was one). > Sorry for also introducing some confusion due to this. > > Harry _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users