On 2010-8-12 06:05 , Kevin Layer wrote: > Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On 2010-8-5 00:55 , Kevin Layer wrote: >>>> Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> The other puzzling thing is how some of your libs managed to be built >>>>>> for both archs when some of their dependencies are i386 only. In any >>>>>> case, perhaps the build output for one of the incorrect ports will shed >>>>>> more light. >>>> >>>> I'm ot exactly sure where the build is, but I've attached >>>> >>>> /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_devel_atk/main.log >>> >>> The universal variant doesn't seem to be set in this log. Since atk uses >>> the muniversal portgroup, when building universal it prints lines like >>> "---> Configuring atk for architecture i386" for each of the configured >>> universal_archs. >>> >>> - Josh > > Any ideas on this? > Thanks. > > Kevin
Sorry this got lost in the email pile for a while... you're really better off posting to the whole list. Not having seen either the command line you used or your config files, I don't think I would rule out user error yet. If there is a bug involved, we need working steps to reproduce. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
