Yeah, I just noticed the clang was removed in llvm 2.8_1.
-- Takashi YoshidaSent with Sparrow
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 12, 2010, at 19:02, Takashi Yoshida wrote: That's strange. I
just tried `which clang` and it came back with '/opt/local/bin/clang'. I also
tried running `port contents llvm` and it listed '/opt/local/bin/clang' among
other things as well. I had older clang installed from version 2.6_2 and 2.7_2
and recently upgraded it to 2.8_0. Here's what I get when I run: `port
installed | grep llvm` llvm @2.6_2 llvm @2.7_2 llvm @2.8_0+clang
(active) Strange part is that older versions do not have any variants listed
(+clang) and when I upgraded to version 2.8, it appears like it picked up clang
variant (which is not listed if you run `port info llvm`) automatically. You
can try installing the older version of llvm but you may also want to hear from
the maintainers first.llvm @2.8_0 included a clang variant which was on by
default.The variant and clang were removed from llvm in 2.8_1. You'll have to
ask the maintainer what the plan is with that.
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
