Thanks, will look into installing from source ... or wait a few days, after all Lion is supposed to come out in July :)
Dom > Developers with access to Lion seeds should install from source. A dmg > for Lion will be made available after Lion is released. > > - Josh > > On 2011-7-19, Dominik Reichardt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What is recommended for Lion? I'm switched through the developer program and >> the previously installed ports work fine but "port upgrade outdated" doesn't >> work fine. Didn't expect it to, I know I need to rebuild anyway. Just >> thought I'd wait for MacPorts 2.0, especially since there isn't a designated >> Lion download. >> So is it recommended to switch via the SL build of MacPorts 2.0 rc1 or wait >> a bit longer (which isn't a problem right now)? >> >> Take care >> >> Dom >> >> >>> Source code and disk images for MacPorts 2.0.0-rc1 are now >>> available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful. >>> >>> While there are no known regressions from 1.9.2 at this point, be >>> prepared to encounter bugs. As always, having a recent backup would be >>> wise. Please report any bugs that you find [2] (after first searching >>> Trac [3], of course!) >>> >>> If no showstopping bugs are found in the next few days, this will become >>> the 2.0.0 release. >>> >>> There are a large number of changes in this release. See the ChangeLog >>> [4] for a list of most of them. You may like to focus your testing on >>> the new features in that list, as well as your normal usage. >>> >>> Notable changes since beta3 are: >>> * The installer's check for the existence of the 'macports' group now >>> works correctly on 10.5. (#30096) >>> * It's again possible to clean just the directories in ~/.macports by >>> running 'port clean' without privileges. >>> * A few issues with fetching archives have been fixed. >> > _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
