On Sep 29, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Sam Kuper wrote:

> I
> didn't recall installing ImageMagick, and because of this fact, and
> also the fact that `which convert` yielded "/usr/local/bin/convert", I
> assumed that the `convert` command had come included with my OS
> (10.6.8), or perhaps the XCode or X11 utilities or some such. In other
> words, I assumed that the reason `convert` was installed was that I'd
> somehow obtained it via Apple.
> 
> So my first question is: was this assumption likely to be correct?
> I.e. has anyone else found that their Snow Leopard system, either by
> default or after it has had some of Apple's developer tools installed,
> has ended up with the `convert` command present (in /usr/local/bin/)
> but not the `mogrify` command?


I don't think your assumption is correct. As far as I know, Apple will never 
install anything in `/usr/local/` and definitely not so on a machine fresh from 
the factory. By convention, `/usr/local/` is for the stuff that the user 
installs.

While you may not recall installing ImageMagick yourself, you might have 
installed something that might have installed ImageMagick. `/usr/local/` is a 
protected directory space, so whatever you installed would have had to ask for 
your password (perhaps via `sudo`).

In any case, installing ImageMagick via macports gives you easy control over 
updating it, and, of course, knowing exactly what you installed when.

Keep in mind, however, macports can also install stuff without you "knowing" (I 
put that in quotes). You might knowingly install software "foo" but foo may 
have dependency on "bar" so you will get bar as well without having knowingly 
installed bar.

--
Puneet Kishor
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users

Reply via email to