Returning the conversation to the list:
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:23, Stephen Langer wrote: > On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Jan 11, 2012, at 11:02, Stephen Langer wrote: >> >>> I realize that this will be hard to do and it's completely unrealistic to >>> expect it, but it would solve a lot of problems. >> >> Ok, so what is a realistic solution to the problem, then? > > I don't know. Have separate ports for the threaded, unthreaded, and OpenMP > versions of everything, so that everybody can pick the versions they want? Which is what I said: subports. > This is a real problem. For example, ImageMagick uses OpenMP and vtk uses > pthreads. My program would like to link to both. I can force ImageMagick to > build without OpenMP by defining a no_openmp variant in a local port > repository, but that's ultimately unsatisfactory, since I'd like to use > OpenMP in other parts of the program. It sounds like a complete mess and I don't know what to think about it either. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
