On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 23, 2013, at 08:48, Xin Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 8:48, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2013, at 07:27, Rainer Müller wrote:
>>>> On 2013-10-23 12:49, Toshiyuki Kamada wrote:
>>>>> I managed to symlink /usr/bin/tar to /usr/bin/gnutar as a quick avoiding 
>>>>> glitch.
>>>>
>>>> If you install from source–which is the recommended way at the moment
>>>> until a disk image is available–you avoid this problem.
>>>
>>> It is not only the recommended way, it is the only way: the binary 
>>> installers are for specific OS X versions, and will prevent installation on 
>>> the wrong OS X version.
>>>
>>> So I still don’t know how users are managing to get into this situation, 
>>> unless it’s by upgrading to Mavericks and forgetting to recompile MacPorts 
>>> afterward like the Migration page says to do.
Yeah, that is exactly what I did wrong.
>>>
>>
>> Will make&make install 2.2.0 from source also have this issue?
>
> ./configure && make && make install should work fine.
Sadly it isn't working for me: complaining about missing Tcl
configuration. I'll try to figure out what is going on and fix it.
>
>> Which is the only way I think to install 2.2.0 on Mavericks.
>
> Building from source is the only way to install any version of MacPorts on 
> Mavericks because we have not yet provided any binaries because Mavericks was 
> only just released.
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users



-- 
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety deserve neither  Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Reply via email to