Hi, > On 19 Jan 2015, at 8:28 pm, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday January 19 2015 20:20:06 Chris Jones wrote: > >>> If one has a too-small SSD, it seems more-than-a-little strange to complain >>> that building/installing a bunch of software packages consumes it. Get a >>> bigger drive. Or smaller expectations. >> >> And how pray does one do that in a Mac Book with non-upgradable Solid state >> storage... > > Getting smaller expectations is impossible for Mac owners, then? :P
I had obviously ignored that part of the reply as 'not a sensible solution'... > > Seriously, there are reasons to cast a wallet-vote against certain products. > Absence of upgradable/replaceable memory (volatile and non-volatile) are > among the main reasons (though only just before absence of ethernet). It might surprise you but I personally agree with Apple's direction here, but we are going OT. It is what it is, and despite what some think minimising disk usage is a reality for a lot of people. Chris > > R. > _______________________________________________ > macports-users mailing list > macports-users@lists.macosforge.org > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
