On May 28, 2015, at 2:47 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It should be safe to build ports that do not depend directly on a failed > port, but it seems not impossible that the ABI-changing effect of the update > of an indirect dependency permeates to a direct dependency. I would consider this a bug in the dependent port. That indirect dependency should be a direct dependency. vq _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
