On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:26 PM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I think you can rely on that for maybe 95% of things, but the remaining > >5%... I've had to help people fix things afterward. > > Do you remember what kind of issue? I'm curious to know under what > conditions "base" cares whether supposedly installed files are actually > present when you do a deactivate? (Not that I ever pushed this to the > limit...) I was apparently headed into a brainfog when I wrote that.. recovered today but catching up on stuff. And I think it was actually the opposite situation that was happening: someone tried to restore /opt/local from a backup, found that there were port components not under /opt/local missing (notably the symlinks into launchd's directories), and a deactivate/reactivate fixed. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
