Dan Hitt <[email protected]> wrote: > When i do 'port search atlas' i see only one variant of 'atlas'. So when i > do 'port info atlas' i get the same output as you do --- i suppose that is to > be expected (?).
The atlas port has multiple variants (https://guide.macports.org/#using.variants): ``` ❯ port variants atlas atlas has the variants: gcc49: build using macports-gcc-4.9 * conflicts with gcc5 mpclang37 perf [+]gcc5: build using macports-gcc-5 * conflicts with gcc49 mpclang37 perf mpclang37: use mp-clang-3.7 and gfortran * conflicts with gcc49 gcc5 perf nofortran: Forgo use of fortran compiler ``` You can also find the variants on the port’s details page: https://ports.macports.org/port/atlas/details/ I’m not sure you should be expecting too much from this port, because 4 years ago the port maintainer wrote: “(…) everyone should seriously drop atlas, especially since support for new Apple hardware is likely never to be added” (https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54342#comment:6) > As to why i added '+gcc15' to the command line, that was based on the advice > of Gemini (Google's AI). Gemini actually suggested that i try +gcc14, but > based on what you and the ports database say, that would have been just as > futile. LLMs like Gemini are wasting a lot of people’s time with hallucinations sadly. Nils.
