The ruby 1.9.1 rake does work without any issues but I wasn't 100% sure because there's also a version of rake in <PATH>/macruby-experimental/bin
-Conrad On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Laurent Sansonetti <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > Our Rakefile-based system has only been tested with /usr/bin/rake, the > version that ships with Mac OS X and that uses Ruby 1.8. > > I did not try with 1.9's rake (though it may perhaps work), and I am sure > that it won't work with macruby's macrake (this explains your SEGV) for the > moment. > > HTH > Laurent > > > On Jul 5, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote: > > Hi, I was wondering, which version of rake should one use to build and run >> the specs/benchmarks with? I ask this questions because my default points >> to >> >> /opt/local/bin/rake >> >> which is the version that's parts of my MacPorts install of Ruby >> 1.9.1p129. Also, I noticed that there's a version called macrake which >> generates the following error on execution: >> >> Segementation fault >> >> -Conrad >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MacRuby-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >
_______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
