Is the critical tag reserved for specs that cause an unrecoverable error in the interpreter, or can they also sometimes indicate priority? In other words, if a tag marked critical starts failing at the assertion/expectation level, rather than at the interpreter level, should that tag be changed to "fails"?
Mike On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Eloy Duran <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes indeed, the ones that segfault should be tagged as critical. > > To list all current critical tags: > $ ./mspec/bin/mspec tag --list critical -B ./spec/macruby.mspec :full > Cheers, > Eloy > > > On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote: > > I think the plan is to tag these as "critical". At least that's what we >> have been doing for a while. Eloy might want to confirm this :-) >> >> Laurent >> >> On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Perry Smith wrote: >> >> How do others feel about changing the tags on the tests that get segv >>> faults to something like "faults". At least with my system, the whole >>> testing chain stops at the segv faults. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Perry >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MacRuby-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MacRuby-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >> > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >
_______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
