On 2011-01-28, at 21:36 , Laurent Sansonetti wrote: > > I would rather avoid any dependency. I agree that keeping track of the gems > you need in a single place is a good idea, though. > > Maybe we should refactor the Xcode templates to do so, eventually.
I'd classify Xcode as a dependency. Simple plain text files are nice and tidy. And that's what a Gemfile is. We can skip Bundler and just steal the Gemfile format, or a subset of it. It's rather well specified: http://gembundler.com/man/gemfile.5.html > Another possibility would be to scan the application's source code and > auto-detect the list of gems, but I prefer to avoid that. Indeed. So many ways this could go wrong. _______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
