here's my take on it. 1) who cares, and 2 they started their accessibility solution with tiger, and that came out in 2004 if memory serves correctly. That would put their term ending 2007. snowy came out last august 2009 with a shiny new improvement in voiceover 3 and the potential three year term is done with.
Sometimes it takes an unpleasantry like a law suite to push someone in to action, but with the advent of speaking ipods, iphones, as well as computers, I think that they are self-propelled and continuing to move in the right direction. On 2010-04-15, at 2:08 AM, Rob Lambert wrote: > I just got wind, from a friend of mine, that the only reason Apple is > accessible to us is because of a lawsuit by the NFB. The term of the > agreement was for accessibility improvements for three years. Here's a > question. First, what's your side of this ordeal? Second, who thinks Apple > will keep up with the accessibility improvements after this three year term > is up? I apologize for making smooth waters mirky, I just wanted to know what > your take on this was. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
