Hi, On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Dave Neary <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Valerio, > > Valerio Valerio wrote: > > Here is a proposal based in previous discussion and proposed > improvements: > > > > Karma source: proposed_formula(current_formula) - notes > > > * Discussion: 2 * sqrt(# posts) - (One point per post) > > Discussion is mailing lists, I think, right? 2*sqrt(#posts) seems a bit > drastic - a mailing list post seems like a bigger contribution than a > comment, no? > Comments are normally feedback from users about a particular app, so in my opinion the relevance is similar. > > *TMO 'gold posts'(new, need to be implemented): Posts with +40/+50 > > thanks receive additional karma (10 ? 20 ?) > > Is this consistent with more karma for doers? > That's a proposed idea, these kind of posts are normally tutorials or very informative, so a bit more relevance for them, just an idea as I said. > > > * Apps: each new app in Maemo5 extras earn 50p > > if (votes > 300) then (300*stars)/6 + 50 > > if(stars>=3 && votes =<300) then (votes*stars)/6 + 50 > > if(stars <3) then 50 > > Do you have any stats on how karma might distribute after application? > Apart from the example above, no, but none of the apps currently in the maemo5 extras will get the maximum karma, since none has more than 300 votes. > This seems like an awful lot of karma, especially if you're "only" > responsible for porting several popular packages to Maemo. Well, that's not a prefect system, we can implement something to give more karma to native apps than to ports, but the intention is to easily calculate karma. > It's also a > very big jump from 2.xx stars to 3 stars. Shouldn't application related > karma be continuous with stars & votes? Why separate <3 stars & >=3 > stars? Is the theory that "bad" applications don't deserve so much karma? > The initial proposal was "Apps with 0 / 2,99 stars don't generate any karma since these ratings are considered low / bad." But I think they deserve some karma at least :). If I didn't make it clear in my previous email, this values are not definitive are only a suggestion, feel free to propose other weights/formulas. Best regards, -- Valério Valério http://www.valeriovalerio.org > Cheers, > Dave. > > > -- > maemo.org docsmaster > Email: [email protected] > Jabber: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community >
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
