Hi,
On 19.12.2011 14:06, ext robert bauer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Andre Klapper
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm not sure if one fix per year outweighs the amount of wasted
time of
bug reporters that file reports against the "official" part just
to end
up in silence, and silence is my impression recently.
Understood. But the operating efficiency of bugzilla is not the only
consideration here. We could make it harder for internal supporters
of maemo within Nokia to obtain funding and other benefits for the
community.
With the current MeeGo operations being ramped down during the next year
and the existing team focusing completely on getting the next N9
software updates finished, there really is no chance of getting any work
done for the N900 any longer. So, keeping the Bugzilla components just
gives false hope. Better to close them for new submissions.
The story is different for the N9 bugs filed at harmattan-bugs.nokia.com
- these still receive active attention, and I warmly recommend reporting
any issues found.
> I agree that we shouldn't take new bugs against "Official" Maemo SW if
> Nokia plans to take no action on them. But instead of concluding that
> it "seems" like Nokia is not interested, why shouldn't we just ask
> them?
A good idea, please go ahead if you have contacts (as I wouldn't know
who to ask).
I have. But it's probably going to take more than a few weeks because
of the holidays and Nokia is responding slowly these days regarding
maemo. So please wait to take action based on an affirmative decision
rather than based on inaction (even though a few weeks is ordinarily
enough time).
Here's your answer. :-)
Cheers,
ma.
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
