On 4/3/2012 16:22, robert bauer wrote:


On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Flegg <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 3 April 2012 13:46, robert bauer <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    > Thanks for pointing that out.  I don't see any way forward
    except to extend
    > for a month.
    >
    > I will invite referendum to amend the council rules...

    Why do you consider a month bad? We've seen this kick off a discussion
    about the difficulties the current council have faced; how things
    could be improved and a discussion about the future of the community.

    I don't expect fully thought through positions to emerge, unbidden,
    from the candidates. I hope a month of open, transparent discussion
    (about all the plans which they've considered/read/propose) would
    produce a much stronger idea of the candidates' ideas.

In these circumstances, it is another month we have two out of three council members who are not active. Having the discussion is obviously good. But I wouldn't be surprised if it dies down after a week or two and we have a period of time just waiting for the vote.


_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

I would like to nominate for the elections:

SD69
Estel
Woody1649
Geneven

I am known on the forum as vi__

Regards,

Paul

<<attachment: psleggs.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

Reply via email to