On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:12:24PM +0200, Piotr Jawidzyk wrote: > I think You're missing the point about "qt style agreement" here - We > *don't* talk about changing license of Maemo software (i.e. opening > closed bits, or whatever). Whole thing is about transferring > governance over project.
That was unclear in the original email. > In the past, Nokia representatives made clear statement, that such > passing of maintainership is perfectly possible and appropriate for > Maemo. Unfortunately, during last Council's period, marias was stating > exactly opposite thing, and ignored multiple requests for > clarification - to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised, I he was just > not informed well enough - it seems like another example of situation, > where left hand doesn't know what right hands does. It may be > approriate in Bible, but doesn't work well for our project ;) > > From my side, I really hope, that there will be enough time to show > quotations of formed statements from Nokia side (to qgil), and as > about comment/clarification. I've never seen such a statement from Nokia -- can you point to it? Regards, Jeremiah _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
