Hi 27. huhtikuuta 2012 12.12 Neal H. Walfield <[email protected]> kirjoitti:
> At Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:06:59 -0400, > robert bauer wrote: > > I became aware that packages were stuck and addressed the qa/promotion > > process a couple months ago - > > Can you please summarize how you addressed this? I started this > discussion by suggesting that we lower the karma threshold at which a > package is promoted, but whatever you've done hasn't effect (at least) > one of my packages, which has three thumbs up, two from "testers:" > > I wouldn't say the problem is fixed. There's been some proposals on how to resolve it but afaik not action yet. Although the tresholds for requires votes were lowered to iirc 3 votes from testers or 6 otherwise. The main problem still is not enough people doing testing. The discussion needs to be resuccerted. I would keep the discussion here and not have in the testing squad list since this is not only a tester thing. > > http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111203/ > > A bit hard package to test. It isn't very clear how to actually use it. so I'd guess that's why it hasn't been tested by that many. Anyway, I tried it and seems there's a missing dependency in the package since apt-woodchuck command raises a missing import exception (gconf) so I just voted it down. Thanks -Timo > Thanks, > > Neal > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community >
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
