Rob, you deserve a device for all of your hard work and effort you've already devoted to the maemo community.
-- Arie www.everythingn9.com @everythingN9 on twitter Sent from my Nokia N9 On 5/4/12 3:01 PM robert bauer wrote: I don't see a problem with a council member getting a device either, but they should not participate on the selection committee if they apply for one. disclaimer - I may apply for one myself. This may come as a surprise, but I don't have an N9 or N950 myself and it would be nice to be able to test out things firsthands. So I'll withdraw from this further. On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: I don't see a problem with a council member getting a device if there are grounds for it. Good practise is not to participate in the decision making if applying for one. The council can of course disqualify themselves if they want to. Timo Piotr Jawidzyk kirjoitti 4.5.2012 19:16: What about specific situation, when someone applying for device, get elected as Council member? As for Coding Competition, I don't see much problem - it's based on votes and applications - but Community Awards, where receivers are chosen by Council? Most easy solution, would be to automatically "banish" elected Council member from possibility of receiving Community Award. It sounds quite unfair, but I admit, that I don't see better solution for now. If someone have any sensible idea, it would be great - AFAIK, we can have 2 or 3 candidates, that are going to apply for device too, so it need to be decided fast. /Estel _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
