This from w00t of all people?
Agreed with the sentiments/point though.
On 26/06/12 5:50 PM, Paul Sleggs wrote:
Guys please be fair. Enough of this bashing. Everyone was doing what
they were doing before the CA was announced. In times like these when
an antagonist serves a rage ball and this ball is on your side of the
net as it where. It is best to stop playing the game. Let them have a
win and have the final say.
On 26/06/2012 08:44, claude bucher wrote:
Piotr.,
don't mention it ;)
as to INABT...
Pierre Coubertin, the "father" of the modern olympic games once said...
«seeking record is as bad for the body as for the soul; it wears out
the body and cripples the soul.»
if a member of the Community was only seeking a device, he probably
lost "the soul", no?
On 26 June 2012 09:25, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Thanks for wise words.
What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of
course, I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do
"bashing on already dead horse".
/Estel
On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed
in-depth.
> Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
> Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
> contribution were to be granted a CA.
> That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
> Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
> effort/skill/time.
> So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win
out over
> other community contributors.
> I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
> haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list
have had.
> Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
> I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
> But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
> deserving users who missed out.
>
> On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
> > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
> > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
> > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement
in a
> > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i
guess...
> >
> > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even
thought the
> > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad
nauseam....)
> > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won
a N950;
> > a couple thoughts about this
> > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for
each of the
> > current Council member, they all made considerable
contributions to the
> > Community and their being in the Council is but the most
recent one (!)
> > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices
were
> > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities,
to put
> > it bluntly.
> > is this what this community is all about? coding?
> > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a
different light
> > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is
going to be
> > needed to save the community...
> >
> > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
> >
> > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > LOL....
> >
> >
> > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
> >
> > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
> > from
> > the CA...
> > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future"
idea?
> >
> > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
> > mailing
> > lists] <[hidden email]
> > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > maemo-community mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
