Marius wrote:
>
> now that the task for defining the Fremantle
> Application Categories has
> started, we have the first proposal.
> The following category should be added:
>
> user/sharing Sharing Plugins
> Plugins that add additional upload protocols to
> applications, such as for Flickr photo upload.
I don't like it, for the following reasons (in order of significance):
1) Plugins for a particular protocol or purpose
should go under the appropriate category. If
a user is looking for a photo upload thing,
they should be trained to look in the
appropriate category (e.g. user/graphics[1]).
A Flickr upload *application* should be next
to a Flickr upload widget, should be next
to a Flickr upload applet, should be next
to a Flickr upload *plugin*.
2) Alternatively, we'd have sub-categories
allowing additions and enhancements for a
particular application are found *under* that
app.
3) Why "limit" the description and facilitation
to *upload* protocols? Sharing is a two-way
process.
4) This semms primarily an Ovi-marketing move
where brands are considered more important
than end-user experience.
Cheers,
Andrew
[1] DHCP struggling at JavaOne (again) so can't check
what the most appropriate category actually is.
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
Maemo Community Council chair
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
