On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Attila Csipa<ma...@csipa.in.rs> wrote:
> A little background: Qt has *official* (=as in done and supported by > themselves) > support only for Java. All other binding are products of other companies That's not true anymore, Qt software moved Jambi to "community support". http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/QT-Axes-Jambi-Possible-Future-as-Community-Project > not available under the LGPL). Considering the (time) distance to Harmattan, > for now I'd say the safest bet is to treat PyQt as community support with the > option of paid support for generic Qt or PyQt issues (in case this is > important for you because of the development of commercial software). In any case, I don't think adding the sip files for any new Qt classes that may appear probably isn't that hard (so the community burden is tolerable). -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
