El mié, 30-09-2009 a las 14:10 +0300, Marius Vollmer escribió: > ext Alberto Garcia <agar...@igalia.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 06:08:00PM +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: > > > >> > we can perfectly create a parallel installable version of the > >> > same library, that the community can maintain in extras and link > >> > against in their applications. > >> > >> Yes, but there are some practical problems about that. > > > > The first obvious problem is that we would end up having two similar > > versions of the same library installed, and that means more disk and > > memory, apart from the inability to use maemo-launcher. > > > > What else? > > You have to be careful to never link two libraries with overlapping > symbols into the same process. In the case of libhildon, that is > probably manageable, and the possibility can probably be ignored.
This shouldn't be a problem. Other distros with more real world experience than maemo cope with this pretty well. For instance, Debian unstable has nowadays two parallel installable versions of libsoup. Objects link against either of them depending on their needs. There should never be the case when someone is linking against the two. Not even if dinamically loadable modules are in place. In our case, Nokia applications and libraries link against what's now shipped by Nokia. That's not going to change. If there is a parallel installable version of hildon, those interested on using it link against it and so should all the modules that they want to load in runtime or whatever. And as far as I know, maemo-launcher only boosts the GTK+ library, but I might be wrong. Claudio _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
